In a finite world drowning in clothes…
Easy — watch every runway show of the season, and ta-daaa, patterns appear.
But after years of practice, you don’t even need the full post-mortem.
One glance, and the verdict is clear: will a collection ignite something,
shift conversations, define an era—or will it disappear into the oblivion of fashion’s endless churn?
Let me tell you, a lot of collections and shows are a pure waste of time and money.
Because let’s be real: when a designer opens with a look as classic as a COS collection—aka simplicity without subversion—what’s left to say? Nice fabric? Good construction? That’s entry-level.
We live in an era drowning in clothes. Mountains of them.
Beautiful silks, meticulous tailoring, the perfect trench, the perfect white shirt, the perfect cashmere sweater, denim with the right wash — yet all drowning in sameness.
But here’s the problem: if fashion is only about making beautiful clothes,
it has already failed.
The eye, fatigued by excess, no longer registers beauty unless it is framed by a story, a stance, a shock to the system.
When no one dares? When the last great fashion controversy was a luxury house trying to pass off a pixelated hoodie as avant-garde?
Today, relevance is no longer about technical prowess;
it’s about narrative audacity.
Clothes must do more than exist — they must speak, twist, suprise and grab attention.
In a saturated world, beauty alone is not enough.
The question is: If dressing well is no longer about impressing a boardroom but about self-expression, fun, and rebellion, then why are so many collections still designed like we're suiting up for corporate jobs — aren't those disappearing anyway?
If the world of work is shifting — why isn’t fashion taking
the opportunity to break every rule?
Instead of designing uniforms for a world that no longer exists, where is the pure creativity, the urge to dress for pleasure rather than for a moribund professional framework?
Is fashion becoming just an aesthetic prompt rather than a real creative force?